Rise Up, Oh Heart, For There is Another Battle to Win

Jul 19

Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is looking pretty good right now

(Source: actuallyalivingsaint, via cthulhu-with-a-fez)

Terry Pratchett's 'The Wee Free Men' is getting a movie adaptation from the Jim Henson Company -

hellotailor:

With a screenplay by Rhianna Pratchett, daughter of Terry Pratchett, we’re finally going to see an adaptation of The Wee Free Men.

The Wee Free Men introduced Tiffany Aching, the young witch who starred in several of Pratchett’s last Discworld books. It also features a group of Discworld characters who seem absolutely perfect for a Jim Henson movie: the Nac Mac Feegle, a community of foul-mouthed and gleefully violent gnomes.

[READ MORE]

(via fireflyca)

My boyfriend told me over text that he didn't know the Minotaur story

Anonymous asked: Cliffhangers are literally the worst??? I mean??? Why? Why would you do this????

Okay, there’s the ‘I’m a dick’ answer which is “I like to make people (especially my roommate) suffer.”  And there’s the ‘I’m a writer’ answer, which is “The next good break point was going to be like five pages down the line and this chapter was already longer than my average goal for this story.”  And then there’s the ‘life is time-consuming’ answer, which is “I wanted to get the chapter out before I was a billion.”

I mean, take your pick, they’re all perfectly true.

things we lost in the fire - Chapter 5 - words-writ-in-starlight (Gunmetal_Crown) - Les Misérables - All Media Types [Archive of Our Own] -

It only took me two goddamn weeks, God help me, but here it is.

bigneonglitter:

hollowedskin:

scorpiofactsdaily:

You are not screaming into the void in vain. The void is just practicing active listening and wants you to let it all out without feeling like it is judging or trying to speak over you

thank you void

flawsinthevoodoo: #the void is there for you #it wants you to know that it and the abyss have been talking #and they both think you’re pretty great #i mean why do you think the abyss looks back into you? #it’s because you look fine as hell

(via windbladess)

notwifi:

thesis statement: i just think it’s funny how…

body paragraph: first of all…

conclusion: so next time you…

This is…actually pretty accurate.

(via starwarsisgay)

majingojira:
“ panopticblast:
“ queer-femme-romulan:
“ theparanoidpansexual:
“ fialleril:
“ fizzygingr:
“ Didn’t think I’d find myself agreeing with Count Dooku but here I am.
”
Okay but he’s honestly 100% right.
”
Wasn’t this addressed though? In...

majingojira:

panopticblast:

queer-femme-romulan:

theparanoidpansexual:

fialleril:

fizzygingr:

Didn’t think I’d find myself agreeing with Count Dooku but here I am.

Okay but he’s honestly 100% right.

Wasn’t  this addressed though? In the Phantom Menace, Padmé specifically says, “The Republic outlaws slavery-” but Anakins’ mom outright states, “The Republic doesn’t exist out here.” Tatooine’s governing body was the hutt empire, a separate entity from the Republic. 

As for Yoda, his edict of the Jedi order being servants rather than rulers meant that while he could challenge policies set by the senate, it was up to his dispatched Jedi Knights to combat the injustice wherever it could be found, but the Jedi did not have police priveledges so they found it very hard to investigate for proof of corruption, only when they witnessed it firsthand would they be able to intervene, specifically so they would avoid a situation like the ending of Revenge of the Sith.

The Hutts were never established in on-screen canon as being separate from the republic, while Tatoonie is implied to be relatively close too Naboo, a confirmed member world. In expanded universe continuity, Tatooine has always been part of the Galactic Republic, regardless of which continuity. Hutt Space was also part of the Galactic Republic in legends, later breaking away following the collapse of the Empire.

Shmi’s comment about the republic not existing on Tatooine is meant to reflect that because it’s not a centre of power or trade, those in the republic takes no notice of it, do nothing for it, and they’re so far away the population never see anything the republic does affecting anything. In essence, they’re on their own, bowing to the criminal cartels just to scrape by.

If you go back and rewatch the prequels without viewing him through the lens of “oh it’s that lovable old frog that teaches Luke and talks silly” prequel Yoda is actually a giant asshole.

“In the novelization, it is made clear that Yoda, being the oldest and most respected member of the Jedi Order, has essentially made it (and its rules) in his own image over the past eight centuries. There is no debate on these rules, there is no dissent permitted, and it is quite clear that membership in the Jedi Council is contingent upon being a meekly agreeable Yoda Yes-Man, which is why Qui-Gon Jinn never made it into the club. 

“If Star Wars Episode 3 is a Greek tragedy, then Anakin Skywalker is not its only tragic figure. Yoda, for all his supposed wisdom, preaches the virtue of selflessness not because he believes he should help others, but because that’s the Code. The Code now exists for its own sake, and over the centuries, he’s forgotten why. In Episode 1, Qui-Gon Jinn would obviously like to help Anakin and his mother escape slavery on Tatooine, but it’s beyond his mandate, and he’s breaking the rules to save even one of them. Why is it beyond his mandate? Because the Jedi Order has no particular mandate to help people. Its only mandate is to keep the peace and uphold the Code. That’s Yoda’s Code, and when Anakin asks him what to do about an impending tragedy, he gives the most useless advice in history: “train yourself to let go”. Thanks a lot, Yoda. I ask you how to stop a tragedy and you tell me to just smile and let it happen.

“Of what use is a moral code if it does not tell you to help others? That is a question which Yoda apparently never thought to ask. Even in Episode 5, when Luke wants to go save his friends, Yoda counsels him to let them die. It is advice that Luke ignores, to his credit. Yoda is not an evil person, but he is not a caring person either. For him, morality is not about caring for others, but about simply following the rules.The biggest problem with “blind obedience to rules” as a moral code is that the instant someone loses faith in those rules, the whole house of cards comes crashing down and they literally don’t know right from wrong. In real-life this phenomenon is often referred to as “preacher’s daughter syndrome”, where a girl has been raised with a lifetime of strict preaching without understanding, so when she gets old enough to question authority she promptly gets herself into serious trouble. Yoda obviously never saw Anakin’s fall coming, because after eight centuries of indoctrinating Jedi from infancy, he simply couldn’t imagine a Jedi not having the same blind faith in the rules that he did. Love, jealousy, hate, anger are all emotions, all passions, all paths to the Dark Side, but caring and sympathy are emotions too, and Yoda threw out the baby with the bathwater.” - Michael ‘Darth’ Wong, creator of Stardestroyer.net

Seemed relevant. 

Yoda may have basically written the codes because, with his long life, he could wait until his opponents just died and bring up his points again with less disagreement (because he taught the other Jedi, of course). 

I am S W O O N I N G

(via patroclvss)

ceallaig1:
“ zora-zen:
“ saarebitch:
“ barefootindecember:
“ provendermalkin:
“ trumpsgloryhole:
“ If Sanders doesn’t get the nomination, and you can’t see yourself voting for Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, then don’t. Vote third party.
Consider...

ceallaig1:

zora-zen:

saarebitch:

barefootindecember:

provendermalkin:

trumpsgloryhole:

If Sanders doesn’t get the nomination, and you can’t see yourself voting for Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, then don’t. Vote third party.

Consider the Libertarian or Green Party.

Don’t feed the establishment by voting for Clinton, and don’t feed authoritarian isolationism by voting for Trump.

No. The absolute largest chunk of people considering changing their votes at the moment are disappointed non-conservatives. There was barely any competition among republicans; from the get-go, the voter base united behind Trump. If non-conservatives split their votes across multiple fronts, they WILL lose.

Voting third party in America throws your vote directly into the garbage. Our system does not work like Australia’s. You don’t get a second or third choice, and candidates who win aren’t going to look at the numbers and say “I see 25% of Americans voted Green, I should implement Green policies.” That’s not how it works. Conservative voters overwhelmingly back a single party, the GOP, while non-conservative voters are the ones that scatter across multiple, weak fronts when faced with an unappealing Democratic party nominee. Think about it like this:

The majority of Republican voters support Trump and are not changing their vote even though party leaders and figureheads are universally decrying him. They’ve been groomed for decades by the GOP to be this way, and now party leaders have lost control of the impressionable voter base they created for themselves. There’s nothing they can do about it at this point. While a small number of Republicans can and are switching parties, it’s not very much. Meanwhile, Democrats are floundering, trying to decide which front to unite under. Some of them go to the Green party or Libertarians, sure; the rest stay with the Democratic party in the hopes that even with people leaving, they will have enough to block Trump. But Trump doesn’t need a majority of total Americans to vote for him; he only needs more than the other candidates have. Do you understand what I’m saying? Trump could get 10% of the vote, but as long as no other party has more than 10%, he still wins. The second you split the left and middle across three or four fronts, the right seizes control. This is how it goes down every single fucking time we go through this.

The other thing to consider is that the electoral college is NOT going to weigh in favor of a third party. Doing so would be political suicide. They are paid to vote certain ways, and not doing so would fuck up their careers. Even if an entire state votes in favor of a third party, the electoral college is going to vote for whichever primary party matches up the closest, and sometimes not even that. Their votes are counted when making the actual choice of president; ours are not. They proved that with Gore. The majority of Americans voted for him; the electoral college installed Bush anyway and told us to suck it up. The question at this point is whether they’d risk it a second time, and we have to hope that they won’t, which is why we have to unite under a single front to block Trump.

^^^^^^^THIS!!!!!!!!!! People do not understand that under our plurality system, it doesn’t matter if the majority of the population doesn’t vote for Trump. As long as he has more than any of the other candidates, he wins. Splitting up the more liberal voters is now what non-Trump supporters want to do.

THESE CHILDREN ARE TOO YOUNG TO REMEMBER ROSS PEROT

And Ralph Nader.

DO NOT SPLIT THE VOTE, PLEASE! GOP is gonna vote Trump, they won’t vote for a 3rd party person. That means a solid voting bloc. Dem who split the vote are in essence giving him a free vote. HILARY WITH ALL HER FAULTS IS STILL BETTER THAN TRUMP!

(via permets-tu-not-permettez-vous)

Friendly reminder

puellaeternus:

“In a healthy relationship, your partner hears you out if you’re upset, and their goal is to avoid upsetting you in the future, not to debate whether you should have been upset in the first place.”

(via lathori)