cthulhu-with-a-fez goddessofidiocy [quietly breaks table] natasha romanoff is not a romantic prop to use interchangeably assetandmission Source: goddessofidiocy I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR THISRECENTLY I REMEMBERED THAT BRUCETASHA EXISTEDAND I WAS ENRAGED ONCE MOREGODMOTHERFUCKERSI FUCKINGI JUSTI CAN'T EVEN TALKFUCKSHITI JUST MEANTHERE WAS SO MUCH FUCKING POTENTIAL WITH NATASHA'S CHARACTERPOTENTIAL TO FOCUS ON RELATIONSHIPS THAT HAD BEEN ESTABLISHEDAND TO BUILD THEM UP WITH THE SORT OF GENTLE SMOOTH GLIDE WE GET INI DON'T KNOWMALE FRIENDSHIPS????YOU THINK NATASHA ROMANOFF SHOULD BE YOUR OBJECT LESSON IN 'MEN AND WOMEN CAN BE PLATONIC FRIENDS?'THEN MAYBE DON'T SHOEHORN HER INTO THE SINGLE MOST AWKWARD AND UNPLEASANT RELATIONSHIP ON SCREENCHRISTMOTHERFUCKING SHITIF YOU REALLY HAVE TO PUT HER IN A FUCKING RELATIONSHIPMAYBE MAKE IT WITH SOMEONE SHE'S ALREADY DEMONSTRATED TO HAVE SOMETHING EVEN CHEMISTRY-ADJACENT WITHLIKEHELLGODDAMN NICK FURY HAS MORE CHEMISTRY WITH HER IN LIKE THAT ONE SCENE WHERE SHE SEES HIS BODYTHAN BRUCE BANNER IN THE WHOLE FUCKING MOVIEFUCKING HELLNATASHA GODDAMN ROMANOFFI AM F U R I O U S