slyrider:

fallingthroughfandoms:

Honestly this drive to make tv shows darker each season is so annoying if I wanted to feel sick to my stomach for hours I would watch the news not my favourite tv program

@words-writ-in-starlight

Oh my God I could snarl about this trend for HOURS, okay, like, listen, just LISTEN, if your TV show is 100% non-stop hardcore tragedy, and you just ante up at the end of every season, that loses its appeal, okay (SPN, I am looking AT YOU, you had potential, I have mentally rewritten everything past Season 3 to my satisfaction, I wrote AN ENTIRE GODDAMN NOVEL as a result of how angry I was, that’s how hardcore I am; SPN is gonna be my negative example here and I’m just not even sorry, that’s what fucking HAPPENS).  

Because the reason tragedy is TRAGIC is because it’s not the fucking status quo, okay, like, that’s how this works.  If every other episode is someone dying or abandoning their morals or fighting with someone they claim to love (GODDAMN MOTHERFUCKING WINCHESTERS, OKAY, IF YOUR WHOLE PLOT IS GOING TO BE ABOUT HOW YOU WOULD DIE FOR YOUR BROTHER, I EXPECT YOU TO ACT LIKE IT, JESUS GOD), then that’s not interesting anymore, and furthermore it’s not sustainable.  Sooner or later something gives out and here’s the thing, HERE IS THE THING, it’s always, always the character.  Not in, like, some emotional ‘poor fragile baby’ way, I mean in the hard and fast writing-a-believable-character way.  After a certain point, that shit falls flat.  If your character’s ONLY defining trait is how miserable they always are, and how much they want out of their life, and how tired they are of their life, that is a one-note character, that is a caricature, and you have officially lost my interest.  Your characters have to carry the show, okay, and that means that they have to be complete, dynamic people at all times, and THAT means that, even if it is Tragedy Train Central, they can’t just fucking mope about it okay.

AND AS LONG AS WE’RE ON THE SUBJECT, anteing up at the end of every season, raising the stakes…um, that’s an expiration-date sort of thing.  That’s not sustainable in the long-term.  That’s how you get into trouble.  Because sooner or later, you will have ante’d up past the point of rationality (*cough* SPN) and you will have really fucked up any perspective on what your character actually cares about (also see “Winchesters comma The”).  Like, all right, y’all, look, if you’re going to ante up every season, bring in a bigger threat, then you need to PACE YOURSELF.  Do NOT just go straight for “Literally the biggest bad in the universe,” do not just pit your characters against the Apocalypse and avert it outright and then just come back the next season with ANOTHER Apocalypse.  (There are times where ‘multiple Apocalypses’ can become a running joke, see: Buffy, but you gotta spotlight that shit and have your characters be blase about it, okay, if you’ve done three possible Apocalypses in a year, your characters have to treat this like just another day at work.)  Because you know what, after the fifth time I’m promised A Real Actual Facts Biblical Apocalypse that everyone is so worried about, I am going to be expecting that you shit or get off the pot.  Give me your goddamn rain of fire or S T O P.  Similarly, if you make something a huge plot point for a season or two, like one of your characters being Not What We Thought (Sam Winchester), or being Possibly Corrupted By Evil (Sam, and then Dean, and then Sam, and then Dean, and then Cas, and then I stopped watching), you need to CARRY THROUGH.  The thing I’m specifically thinking of here is the Sam thing in the first couple seasons, the whole “well he’s a hunter but also demon blood” thing that they devoted two seasons to.  Like.  You can set that up, totally, I set up a novel on that premise so I’m not going to judge, but then you need to stick to your guns.  It’s a risky move, plot-wise, because it explicitly aligns a protagonist with the Dark Side, as it were.  It’s Plot Russian Roulette.  But then you have to pull the trigger.  You can’t flinch and drop that plot point once you’ve put a lot of time and effort into it.  Because once you drop THAT alignment with the Dark Side, you’re going to feel compelled to ante up (see above) and that will get out of hand and your characters will suddenly need to ante up from SATAN, literal goddamn SATAN, and like I’m sorry but that…that’s just fucking embarrassing.

TL;DR: I have a chip on my shoulder the size of Mount Rushmore, tragedy is only interesting if it’s unusual, characters are only interesting if they’re not one-note, and go ahead and play Plot Roulette, but don’t flinch when you pull the trigger.  And SPN flunked all of these criteria, thus the chip.

(Source: starsarewishesindisguise)

c-is-for-circinate:

fourteenacross:

anachronistique:

fourteenacross:

Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters is now open for enrollment!

CAN WE TALK ABOUT HOW THIS IS THE GREATEST THING I’VE EVER SEEN??

forget apocalypse, give me 2 hours of 80s private school mutant hijinks

I think we all know that, legitimately, this is my ideal X-Men movie.

Fact: if you call the 800 number in this video, you get an answering machine recording of a crochety older man thanking you for your interest in Xavier’s School and inviting you to leave a message or join them for their upcoming open house.

I LOVE IT.

(via fireflyca)

kaijuno:

kaijuno:

Observation: I have never broken a bone
Hypothesis: I am boneless
Data: I appear to have broken at least two bones in my foot slipping on the ice
Conclusion: I have at least two bones. Strong evidence suggests the possibility of a third one. 

I’m an astrophysicist. 

THAT IS MY FAVORITE COMEBACK EVER.

(via littlestartopaz)

lupinatic:

letsbeperfectlyreckless:

cyanine:

zubat:

importantrose:

cherrywitch:

turv:

Members of Ukrainian feminist group Femen staged protests across Europe as they called for a “topless jihad.” The demonstrations were in support of a young Tunisian activist named Amina Tyler. Last month, Tyler posted naked images of herself online, with the words “I own my body; it’s not the source of anyone’s honor” written on her bare chest. The head of Tunisia’s “Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice,” reportedly called for Tyler to be stoned to death for her putatively obscene actions, lest they lead to an epidemic. Tyler has since gone quiet, leading some to fear for her safety.

This is too punk

This is so incredibly raw and important and it needs to spread like wildfire

HELL YEAH badass as fuck

Femen and their “topless jihad” protests are absolute fucking garbage and I can’t believe they’re being praised on my dashboard. I’m not a Muslim woman so I will quote Uzma Kolsy instead regarding the issue. 

“The reason that I and other Muslim women were turned off by Femen was because their motivations and methods reeked of a pervading and deep-rooted ignorance of Islam itself. […] Femen did not spark a much-needed discussion on human rights violations against women in the Muslim world. Instead, it ignited a number of incendiary attacks on the beliefs and autonomy of Muslim women; first in Muslim-majority countries, and later, the global community. The protest prompted Muslim women to speak up — not just because they took particular offense to the tired notion they are gagged and rendered mute, but because they felt the need to defend their faith and their right to choose how they practice it. This meaningful response undercut Femen’s core, flawed presumption, that Muslim women are oppressed because Islam is inherently oppressive. To defend Femen’s protests, then, is to defend this line of thinking a dangerous, caustic, and inept approach in tackling issues of gender inequality in the Muslim world today. […] Femen may have stood up for one woman’s right to bare her body, but they denounce my right and choice to cover mine, however I see fit. The discourse that Femen brought to the floor is not one that will allow us to progress as a society, but it is one that will pigeonhole all Muslim women as oppressed victims, frame the discussion within the bounds of the stereotypes that exist about Muslim women, and will relegate Muslim women to constantly defending their faith rather than discussing the larger issues at hand. And then there is the hijab, the iconic piece of cloth that Femen has deemed a symbol of oppression. Wearing the hijab, to be clear, is a sacred act of worship that many Muslim women practice voluntarily. In fact, I have friends who cover their hair against the will of their husbands and fathers who, ironically, fear for their safety in an increasingly Islamophobic climate. In a sorely misinformed and cruelly inimical statement, Femen’s leader Inna Shevchenko equated the hijab with “the blood and all the crimes that are based on your religion,” and called for Muslim women to remove it in solidarity. And what if the Muslim woman she was debating had complied? She’d be doing it as an act of coercion. When Femen’s free speech thwarts a woman’s freedom of religion, then they have become no better than the abusers they are protesting. […] Thousands of Muslim American women wear the hijab, and it falls within their Constitutionally protected rights to do so. Making associations that imply that the donning of the headscarf is oppressive, while showing off silky tresses is liberating, is unscrupulous. In the aftermath of the Femen protest, Muslim women came out in droves to demonstrate that Islam is not oppressive and that they have the right to choose to wear the hijab. In response, Shevchenko told Huffington Post U.K., “They write on their posters that they don’t need liberation but in their eyes it’s written ‘help me.’” As supposed trailblazers in initiating a discussion on women and religion, it is tragically ironic that when Muslim women spoke up, Femen didn’t care to listen. […] In the post-9/11 world, Femen’s dangerous assertions only feed the already raging flames of Islamophobia. It is wrong to associate violence perpetrated in the name of Islam with an emblem of faith because it perpetuates the horridly inaccurate assumption that Islam condones violence. To say that Islam guides its adherents to commit atrocities against any people speaks to the limited understanding of the accuser. […] Contrary to what Femen would have you believe, it is possible to practice Islam and champion women’s rights at the same time. Muslim feminists would tell you as much — as long as they aren’t being drowned out.” (x)

Don’t support Femen. Don’t support their “topless jihad” protest. Don’t perpetuate Islamophobia. 

tldr: FEMEN IS A GARBAGE ORGANIZATION

I wasn’t going to reblog until the last two ^ 

I love my religion so much, and I choose not to wear the hijab right now, but the amount of friends I have who adore it and love wearing it is enough for me to understand the freedom of choice.

Sorry - I forgot to tag this as islamophobia! Going back and doing it now

(via cthulhu-with-a-fez)