assetandmission:

goddessofidiocy:

[quietly breaks table] natasha romanoff is not a romantic prop to use interchangeably 

image

(via cthulhu-with-a-fez)

Tags: I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR THIS RECENTLY I REMEMBERED THAT BRUCETASHA EXISTED AND I WAS ENRAGED ONCE MORE GOD MOTHERFUCKERS I FUCKING I JUST I CAN'T EVEN TALK FUCK SHIT I JUST MEAN THERE WAS SO MUCH FUCKING POTENTIAL WITH NATASHA'S CHARACTER POTENTIAL TO FOCUS ON RELATIONSHIPS THAT HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED AND TO BUILD THEM UP WITH THE SORT OF GENTLE SMOOTH GLIDE WE GET IN I DON'T KNOW MALE FRIENDSHIPS???? YOU THINK NATASHA ROMANOFF SHOULD BE YOUR OBJECT LESSON IN 'MEN AND WOMEN CAN BE PLATONIC FRIENDS?' THEN MAYBE DON'T SHOEHORN HER INTO THE SINGLE MOST AWKWARD AND UNPLEASANT RELATIONSHIP ON SCREEN CHRIST MOTHERFUCKING SHIT IF YOU REALLY HAVE TO PUT HER IN A FUCKING RELATIONSHIP MAYBE MAKE IT WITH SOMEONE SHE'S ALREADY DEMONSTRATED TO HAVE SOMETHING EVEN CHEMISTRY-ADJACENT WITH LIKE HELL GODDAMN NICK FURY HAS MORE CHEMISTRY WITH HER IN LIKE THAT ONE SCENE WHERE SHE SEES HIS BODY THAN BRUCE BANNER IN THE WHOLE FUCKING MOVIE FUCKING HELL NATASHA GODDAMN ROMANOFF I AM F U R I O U S