holyhamills:

I think this sums up tumblr’s reaction, from what I’ve seen.

I suggest everyone relax until we know more.

(via johanirae)

assetandmission:

goddessofidiocy:

[quietly breaks table] natasha romanoff is not a romantic prop to use interchangeably 

image

(via adelindschade)

ssoulpunks:

so how much u wanna bet the russo bros are gonna erase the entire bruce/nat subplot with one well-timed throwaway line

PLEASE GOD.

(Source: bonesleo, via clintashamcu97)

assetandmission:

goddessofidiocy:

[quietly breaks table] natasha romanoff is not a romantic prop to use interchangeably 

image

This has got to be the fourth time I’ve reblogged this.  I think I’ll do it some more.

(via yea-lets-do-this-shit)

  • Marvel: to relate to female audience, we will have Black Widow involved in a romance with a team member
  • Every Girl I've Ever Heard: I want to see Natasha Romanoff crush a man's skull with her thighs without a single hair falling out of place, and then I want her to terrorize her teammates with bad jokes and pranks
  • Marvel: to relate to the female audience we will have Black Window involved in a romance WITH ANOTHER TEAM MEMBER

assetandmission:

goddessofidiocy:

[quietly breaks table] natasha romanoff is not a romantic prop to use interchangeably 

image

(via adelindschade)

assetandmission:

goddessofidiocy:

[quietly breaks table] natasha romanoff is not a romantic prop to use interchangeably 

image

(via thepainofthesass)