theory-witch-ferlu:

prettyarbitrary:

rudolphsb9:

ragtiime:

sayotruepersonal:

frompawntoqueen:

tiz85:

teddyhocuspocusaltman:

dhampiric-mayhem:

acodanies:

teddyaltmoe:

teddyaltmoe:

teddyaltmoe:

what if

asexual characters

who weren’t androids or aliens

whose asexuality wasn’t seen as something needing to be ‘fixed’

and who aren’t socipaths

Does godzilla count as a sociopath?

image

TO BE HONEST I WOULDN’T REALLY USE GODZILLA AS A SHINING EXAMPLE OF ASEXUAL REPRESENTATION IN MEDIA BECAUSE GODZILLA IS A HUGE FUCKING LIZARD

Idk, I would like to be represented by Godzilla.

Not gonna lie sometimes when I hear acephobic shit I too want to destroy a city. 

Godzilla sounds like a great Ace mascot

monokvma

I love the direction this went in.

I’m pleased to be represented by Godzilla, but we need more than one ace character, even if he is the size of 500 non-ace characters.

Hate to be that person, but that screenshot is from Godzilla ‘99. The Godzilla in that film is a mutated, pregnant female lizard looking for a place to lay her eggs, which happens to be New York. Now, I know aces can have sex, and Japanese Godzilla is, as far as I know, pretty asexual, but maybe that one (‘99) is a better example of single mothers having badass representation.

Okay, but the ‘99 Godzilla is able to reproduce without help from another one.  Asexuals get a lot of really distasteful jokes about ‘reproducing asexually.’  That Godzilla is a solid tongue-in-cheek joke.  I mean, yes, the other Godzillas also work and I 100% support representing asexuals as nuclear-energy-breathing creatures of great and awesome power, and representing single mothers as world-conquering beings both terrifying and excellent in nature, but…yeah.

(Source: roguefucker69)