fuckyeahisawthat:
“lierdumoa:
“fuckyeahisawthat:
“Interviewer: You’ve got this rage within you. Where does it come from?
Charlize Theron: Uh…surprise. Women have that. I’m not the only one. (x)
#i will never get tired of looking at Furiosa’s various...

fuckyeahisawthat:

lierdumoa:

fuckyeahisawthat:

Interviewer: You’ve got this rage within you. Where does it come from?

Charlize Theron: Uh…surprise. Women have that. I’m not the only one. (x)

#i will never get tired of looking at Furiosa’s various murder faces

Attn: all the white feminists complaining that Furiosa isn’t a good feminist icon because she’s “acts like a male action hero” – rage is not masculine. Angry female characters are not “emulating men.” 

I actually had that debate with someone right after I saw the movie (a dude, with whom I agree on many things politically), about whether you could call a movie where women use violence feminist. I was all “rage and violence do not belong to men, even if they are coded masculine in our society.” This article says it much more articulately than I did at the time.

I would like to write something further about this, because I have a lot of thoughts as a writer/director about women expressing anger and being violent on screen, and how it’s often only allowed to be shown in certain ways. (I wrote about some of this in Furiosa vs. Tropes for Women in Action.) But at the moment I think the number of notes on this post is doing a good job of making my point.

bonehandledknife:

redshoesnblueskies:

bonehandledknife:

schwarmerei1:

charlidos:

Tom Hardy and Nicholas Hoult interviewed in Cannes. 

Apparently, because they were in such barren land, and because they couldn’t talk emotions, they communicated via giving each other gifts… Tom mentions haberdashery and arts & crafts. And says he made Nick a necklace and a bracelet. And Nick made Tom a hat and gave him a piece of rock he found because it made him think of Tom…

I know Nick’s said he started knitting on set, so he probably knitted that hat!. And I love how they sort of mime the act of giving each other these things.

Side note: but I love how French TV is fuck subtitles, we’re dubbing that shit! The voice for Charlize is particularly LOL

“and because they couldn’t talk emotions, they communicated via giving each other gifts”

so you mean there is a literal behind the scene component to “here have a boot” “have a wheel” “have my blood” (”have my name”)?

YOU HAD TO SAY IT.  YOU REALIZE YOU HAVE CAUSED WEAK KNEES ALL THROUGHOUT THE FANDOM, RIGHT?

??? huh?

I mean it kinda parallels the huge fights that Tom and Charlize had before they’d settled into their characters. I seriously wonder if that was part of why Miller shot the movie sequentially, since he had his hands full with the action a literally had basically no time to walk the actors through where their headspace is at any particular time.

What I’m seriously curious about is during which scene that they finally ‘got’ it. Though I know in hindsight that Tom called getting his nose broken during the Water fight “very nice”.

Then again he did get knocked out twice by Rictus’ actor during the final chase so in hindsight that might not have seemed like much.

urulokid:

leradny:

leizycat:

I WOULD have reblogged this really cool thing I read about Mad Max: Fury Road, if the person hadn’t called it a “feminist” movie.

Yes, it was a very good movie, and it had many strong female characters, but it was not a feminist movie.

It’s not yours. it wasn’t made for you. Just because you enjoyed it doesn’t make it “feminist”.

Was it advertised as feminist? No. Was it MADE to be feminist? No. As a matter of fact, Charlize (Furiosa) even said “ George [Miller] didn’t have a feminist agenda up his sleeve” - and despite her pushing Mad Max as a feminist movie, it wasn’t one. It was just a good move.

Fuck off. Seriously.

ummmmmmmm, just on logic terms this is completely nonsensical

say you never intended to throw a ball into a basket but it lands there anyway and everyone’s like “THAT WAS SUCH A GREAT FREE THROW”, would you react with such vitriol and say “FUCK OFF BASKETBALL FANS, I NEVER INTENDED IT TO BE A FREE THROW”

like what is so wrong with fury road being appreciated for respecting women??? we’re not trying to grab it away from you, we’re just saying “so mad max respects women and we, as feminists, REALLY ENJOY IT THANK YOU GEORGE MILLER.”

[rubs my icky GIRL hands all over mad max fury road] this is MINE now

(via adelindschade)

  • charlize theron: this is an incredibly feminist movie
  • tom hardy: it’s a total empowerment of women. it's about fucking time, honestly
  • george miller: [hires feminist consultant as a part of the crew] i can't help but be a feminist
  • questionable men: maD MAX?? FEMINSTI??? GET YOUR MITTS OF MY GRUB HOW DARE YOU

primarybufferpanel:

youkaiyume:

Did Someone say… TRADING PAINT?!

I told bassfanimation that I’d do it so I did. *whispers* you didn’t think I’d do it did you?

Truthfully I just wanted to draw Toast and Capable shouting stupid innuendos at Max and Furiosa. And Furiosa giving zero fucks. Hooray for car slang!

And BONUS ACE! Because he’s totally alive and not dead and shut up im not listening to logic lalala.

cameo boltcutter sigil on Furiosa’s belt for primarybufferpanel cuz I thought it was a nice replacement for the skull.

*SLAMS on the reblog button*

There is nothing about this I do not love (and of course Ace is alive)

cygnaut:

mumblingsage:

solitarymushroom:

mumblingsage:

molluscagonewild:

socially-awkward-libra:

Okay, so I was watching Mad Max…. and during this scene I noticed something…

image

Let’s take a closer look…

image

Now, pardon my bad gif making skills but…

image

IS THAT FURIOSA RESTING ON MAX’S SHOULDER!? 

image
image
image
image

you’re right, that’s her

So not only are they sitting on the roof & holding hands while the car drives onto the lift, they’ve been resting against each other the entire way there!?

I didn’t know they were holding hands on the roof! I wonder if the car ride is missed out in the same way that Max killing the Bullet Farmer is missed out. Like Furiosa is out for the count pretty much so would it be too focused on Max? In the same way the other scene in other action films would have been included?

There would have been so much bonding through unspoken words and eye contact and touching tho omg I want to know what happened during this drive!!

Oh yeah they were. It’s like 95% to provide physical support for her but…that other 5%… 

(And I kind of feel like after the moment of intimacy and vulnerability “My name is Max” ends on, both of them need and deserve a long drive with her napping on his shoulder. The more I think about it the more it feels right.)

I just want high-res screencaps of every millisecond of this last scene.

I’m still not over this. THEY’RE SO CUDDLY AT THE END

Furiosa is completely exhausted and all of Max’s barriers are down after the blood-giving scene. Like 95% it’s about literal physical support, but 5% is “oh god after everything we went through I’m so glad you’re alive let’s touch”

(Source: whoa-there-mcfuckboi, via bonehandledknife)

Ranting About Feminism: It’s racist for you to ask me to overlook no diversity. And I’m not fucking doing it.

bonehandledknife:

redshoesnblueskies:

anothertgwfan:

busy-beaver:

fangirljeanne:

awkwardthuggin:

I don’t know how many of you guys know about it but this new movie, “Mad Max” just came out  and has already reached critical acclaim. I haven’t seen it , but it’s supposed to be this groundbreaking masterpiece and a huge step for feminism. Which is all good and dandy In theory. But on tumblr there’s been a lot of criticism because the ALL white cast (with the minor exception of Zoe Kravitz). One of the most frustrating things about these types of movies and conversations is that there’s ALWAYS these white feminists that want to tell POC that we have to overlook lack of diversity and basically “take one for the team” (the team being feminism/woman). No. I’m not going to do it. It is fucking disrespectful and borderline racist for you, a white person, to tell minority women that we have to ignore not being represented. Since turning 18 and starting to really think about racism and the media, it is especially uncomfortable for me to watch movies and tv shows with NO people of color. This world is mostly non white and it simply doesn’t make sense for our media to not represent it. And as for feminism, this is not the first time this has happened. When Girls came out, minority women were expected to ignore the show having an all white cast because it was written and directed by Lena Dunham. And anyone who dared to not ignore this issue was considered “non progressive”. This is why I don’t identity as feminist. Because this is unacceptable. It’s unacceptable for these huge steps for feminism to not include people of color. And if you’re white and telling people to get over it, you’re a part of the fucking problem.

Okay, I don’t want to take away from some really great points you’re making about how white feminism often downplay or outright dismiss the representation of women of color, especially in discussions of mainstream media WOC are often silenced or ignored.

However, I need to point a few errors that are a common form of microaggression that I see pop up all the time in intersectional discussions of representation, specifically in regard to the recognition of indigenous women of color.

There are THREE women of color in Mad Max Fury Road. Zoe Kravitz (which you already listed), but also Courtney Eaton and Megan Gale. Eaton and Gale are biracial Maori women. The presence of Polynesian women in this film and a fictional future are incredibly important on multiple levels. 

The Mad Max films are set in a post-apocalyptic Australia. In fact, the franchise began as Australian films, George Miller the writer/director/creator of this world is Australian. This is not merely a geographic location, but an important cultural context for the films. 

What’s important about the location and the presence of Polyneisan women within this future world is how their very roles reflect the history of colonialism in the Pacific region. Polynesian people were forced to relocate, our cultures and even identities erased. Many of us are biracial and our own ethic identity are often erased due to a form of cultural genocide that was not unlike what was done to Indigenous people of the Americas. 

Polynesian women have long been viewed as tokens of exotic beauty. Taken as trophies, and forced in to sex work. Not unlike Fragile. Some, like The Valkyrie who actively fought against colonial oppressors. While Zoe/Toast is biracial black and Ashkenzai jew, she two represents an aspect of WOC’s journey through white supremacy and colonialism which was the driving force behind the trans-atlantic slave trade. 

Polynesians often are erased, or mistakenly seen as white passing often because White Western culture only teaches how to see black or white, ignoring or wholesale erasing all the many colors in between. One of the really ugly truths behind why so many indigenous people are “white passing” is because of the long legacy of us being raped by white oppressors. Many of us only being valued as “pretty” sexual objects for the enjoyment and consumption of white men.

There is a BIG difference between being white passing and having your ethnicity erase from mainstream awareness. People, even POC, default code Polynesian women as white because they only SEE the parts of our features that are stereotypically viewed to be “white.” 

I immediately recognizing Fragile and The Valkyrie as women of color, and was deeply moved about how their presence and individual roles in this film reflects the struggles of many indigenous women throughout history and to see them empowered and fighting back against their oppressors made my heart soar.

Also there ARE other people of color in the film, though by virtue of the dominate culture in the film being literally white male supremacy, the only men of color we see are in the lowest cast of society. Not uncommon in colonialism either, given how white men see MOC as a threat to their power and masculinity.

My only real complaint about race in this film is the lack of Indigenous Australians in leading roles. There are a few of them crowd shots of the Citadel’s lower class, and at the end of the film we see a disabled Indigenous Australian man become the focus of a full two second shot, acting as the face of the oppressed class as he is quite literally is lifted up to salvation by women of color.

There are powerful visual moments in this film, that tell not just a story of punching down the patriarchy, but of the dismantling of colonial oppression where indigenous women play key roles in the fight and future of the world.

So please don’t steal this context from the these women. It is very important to many women of color. 

image
THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU 
I’m a Maori woman and it means so much to me to hear someone say FINALLY point this out. I wanna say this to ALL of tumblr so LISTEN UP!
The line between POC and White is very blurred in my culture. There are no ‘full’ Maori left, so everyone is biracial. I wanna point out that this is a very old way of thinking, as nowadays if you’re Maori then that’s it. YOU. ARE. MAORI. 
No matter what you look like, you are Tangata Whenua (people of the land). But I’ll be using it to get my point across. 
There are people with all sorts of different skin colours in my culture now and It makes me SEETHE whenever I see comments like the op. How DARE you dismiss ANYONE FROM A CULTURE THAT ISN’T EVEN YOUR OWN, just because you have been taught to only see in black and white and you can’t accept the fact that they’re from said culture JUST because they don’t ‘look like it’. For us, having people with dark skin, light skin and everything inbetween is NORMAL and we don’t question it. 
So don’t you DARE say that those beautiful woman in that film ‘DON’T COUNT’ We aren’t just some three letter word that you can label us with at your convenience. ‘PoC’ is not some super secret club. You don’t get to decide who is Maori and who is not. So you take that racist BS and shove it because we’re not interested. Especially when it is coming from someone who knows nothing about our culture and the people in it. 
Also, I know your intentions were good but PLEASE don’t refer to us as ‘white-passing’ as it’s just another way to isolate people within their own culture. We are Maori. End of story.

(emphasis mine)

Co-sign from this NZ-raised Polynesian woman.

We’re all mixed here. All of us. It’s so normal that we don’t put a freaking percentage on it and we realise that heritage and ethnicity is more than the colour of your skin, your particular shade of brown or how ‘ethnic’ your features are. It’s what you are.

One of my favourite parts of this movie was to see my people on a movie screen. It’s so rare for those of us of polynesian heritage to see ourselves reflected back in cinema and to see posts and articles that erase our culture or dismiss our heritage because we aren’t dark enough for someone of another culture is not only racist and ignorant, it’s also incredibly hurtful.

#mad max   #racism   #fucking finally   #it’s taken ages to find a good post on this   #reblogging for commentary   (fel-as-in-tumbld)

This hasn’t gone around in a while, and the Fury Road fandom has spread out a bunch so I’m reblogging. This is important, intersectional representation is important.


[a not-unimportant tangent: whitewashing of the warboys is commented on frequently, yet below the white-power hierarchy there are a lot of POC warboys (are there enough? probably not); it’s just hard to find them since they are all painted white in homage to their oppressor/god. What this tells us about the in-universe racism is clear, and what this tells us about the movie’s meta-commentary on racism is clear.  It’s not that the movie is whitewashed so much as the in-universe racism causes the war boys to literally whitewash themselves. 

You add to that that Joe - despite the in-universe racism - has 2 WOC in his ‘wives’, evoking the horrid yet universal fetishization of WOC by their enslavers….That’s damning and self aware commentary on racism by the movie.  It is not perfect…but it’s also not omitted.]

Reblogging this because it’s been awhile and I have many new followers and while I admit that the POC representation could be better in the movie with more Aboriginal actors both male and female, it’s fairly hypocritical of posts arguing for representation when they are committing acts of erasure themselves.

Additionally the fact that these boys are metaphorically ‘raised white’ speaks to Australia’s historically bad and ongoing issue with white men raping indigenous women and stealing their children to be raised as white.

When “act of genocide” was used in the 1997 landmark report Bringing Them Home, which revealed that thousands of Indigenous children had been stolen from their communities by white institutions and systematically abused, a campaign of denial was launched by a far-right clique around the then prime minister John Howard. It included those who called themselves the Galatians Group, then Quadrant, then the Bennelong Society; the Murdoch press was their voice. (x)

Mad Max is a story made by an Australian director, honed by an Australian screenwriter, and I wished people would stop forgetting that.

(Source: sleezy)

primarybufferpanel:
“schwarmerei1:
“thoughtfulfangirling:
“schwarmerei1:
“redshoesnblueskies:
“ooksaidthelibrarian:
“warboydogbite:
“tfuriosa:
“I need to talk about Rictus. I have seen him mentioned a few times here and there, and I have come across...

primarybufferpanel:

schwarmerei1:

thoughtfulfangirling:

schwarmerei1:

redshoesnblueskies:

ooksaidthelibrarian:

warboydogbite:

tfuriosa:

I need to talk about Rictus. I have seen him mentioned a few times here and there, and I have come across some fanfiction as well, so I think I am not alone. But I have some thoughts that need to come out. Not even necessarily headcanon, but just… pondering/thinking. 

I actually kind of like Rictus. I do not see him as a true villain in the this story. If anyone could have been reached by the Wives after Joe`s death, I think it`s him. He genuinely seems delighted to see Cheedo, and is happy to follow her orders; I think if he had no one else to tell him what to do, he would listen to her.

There. I said it.

*deep breath before I get hated on and/or disagreed with*

Rictus is repeatedly referred to as a man-child in interviews with both Nathan Jones and George Miller, and it is clear from his behavior that he has cognitive and perhaps even other developmental disabilities. His chin strap is to conceal an ostensible slack-jaw (is this canon? Or is it speculation? Either way…), so while it does sort of fit with the scary-as-fuck-giant-guy look, it also covers up a major weakness and flaw. 

In an interview with WWE.com, Nathan Jones talks about Rictus`s backstory a little:

“I’m sort of like my father’s right hand man. His name’s the Immortan [played by Hugh Keays-Byrne]. He’s this narcissistic megalomaniac; he’s a bit of a tyrant. I have a love-hate relationship with my father. [I’m] more of an enforcer. I never do anything good enough for him, so he’s always putting me down, and I’m always trying to impress him and earn his respect. But basically, I’m a big kid. It’s kind of a contradiction.”

While Rictus` physicality may offer him a layer of protection (as does his status at the Immortan`s youngest son), the film does hint at his being treated like a kid. He is ordered around a lot, in the film, and he obediently does as he is told, and it does seem like someone else has to be around to control him at all times. 

When Rictus plaintively asks to take a peek through Corpus Colossus`s looking glass, he gets talked down to, scolded like a naughty kid. “Go see what`s agitatin` Dad!” and so he does. When he is having a grand old time intimidating the War Rig with a flamethrower, an imperator has to tell him to simmer down. Clearly, Rictus is too stupid to carry on unchecked, and especially in Corpus Colossus`s case, Rictus must serve as the legs and the brawn that he lacks. And, as I said before, Cheedo needs only ask Rictus to take her and he immediately does. 

However, Rictus also seems to me to be battle fodder; we never once see Joe treating Rictus like he is special (though I am sure he was treated quite well), and he is expected to be right at the front line of battle. Granted, Corpus Colossus cannot get out into the thick of things, but he *could* ride along in theory. Rictus may be the Immortan`s son, but clearly he does not warrant concern in the safety department. If he dies, he goes to Valhalla and that`s that, I guess.

But all that is NOTHING when it comes to what Rictus does in what, to me, is one of the top five character-building moments in the film. 

As Joe clutches Angharad`s lifeless body, Rictus futilely fires off round after round in rage as the War Rig pulls further into the distance. He knows what her fall means.

When the Organic Mechanic is working on her in Gigahorse, Rictus is right outside with Joe, concerned. And when the doc tells him about the poor dead baby, what does he do?

He lifts his voice to the sky, and he shouts for all the world:

“I had a brother! I had a little baby brother! And he was perfect, perfect in every way!”  

There is genuine grief and pride in his voice when he says this. He is so excited to know that he had a brother, but he is also devastated that he did not live. 

So in a very roundabout way, I am saying this (but borrowing another`s words): “Amid all the glorious blood and thunder of Mad Max: Fury Road, there are a few moments of genuine pathos. And the one that sticks with me the most is Rictus Erectus, the terrifyingly huge and tragically simpleminded son of lead villain Immortan Joe, bellowing about his baby brother to his father’s assembled vehicular mass. The weight of that moment comes from the character’s story: Rictus is a physical powerhouse with unspecified mental problems, treated like dirt by his father for not being the “perfect” heir.” (Tom Breihan on Grantland)

Let`s not forget his collection of baby heads; everyone else is covered in skulls and shit, but Rictus chooses baby heads. Why? I will digress into a head canon here, but could it not be that he has lost many little brothers, even little sisters, over the years, and these heads make him feel less alone-remembering each and every one of them by surrounding himself with substitutes? What if there is a head for every lost baby? Did he start by decorating his own body, then his car, and probably even his room back in the Citadel? How old was he when he started doing this? 

(On a roll now, bear with me!) I can imagine little Rictus, fawning over a pregnant Wife, touching her belly, “Babies come from here?” and then inevitably, the baby is born wrong or comes too early… and all the anticipation turns to hurt. “Why did it die?” he asks the Wife. “Sometimes they just do,” she would say, and then later, she would hand him a little doll. “Play with this for now. Wait for the next baby.” Joe can`t stand the sight of his son with a baby doll, so he rips its head off when he sees Rictus playing with it. “Don`t be stupid, Rictus!”

Rictus, feeling like he`s lost the baby all over again, takes the head and fashions it into a necklace. Joe doesn`t object, and Rictus wears it until the string holding it around his bull neck is too tight. By now he has many doll heads, but he takes that first one and puts it on his belt. He will never forget that first baby that died, or the doll that Joe killed.

Ok. I`m done.

RICTUUUUUUUUUUUS!

Sources:

 http://grantland.com/hollywood-prospectus/behold-rictus-erectus-the-action-stylings-and-wrestling-history-of-the-musclebound-monster-in-mad-max-fury-road/ 

http://www.wwe.com/inside/nathan-jones-mad-max-interview-27383734

Wonderful thoughts and insights! <3

The ‘baby brother’ moment always kills me. Rictus is, in his way, just as abused as the Wives and I am so here for a closer look at that. Not because I want to see him as innocent because he totally is not. But because I want to see him as the character he is, not the stereotype. And especially not the stereotype he’s played as in the comics.

The comic did a nasty disservice to Rictus. Developmentally delayed people are NOT amoral!! Morality and kindness and awareness of another’s wellbeing are NOT linked to intelligence! In fact, intelligence often gets in the way of those things.

It pissed me off no end that comic-Rictus was portrayed as a brutal perpetator.

That aspect sits so uneasily with me. Statistically Rictus is so much more likely to be a victim of sexual assault than an attempted perpetrator… Him just having an attachment to Cheedo that terrifies her because he’s so physically threatening could have worked fine in its place, I don’t see why they needed to make it sexual. (I think Joe could have just assumed that everyone wanted the same thing from his “property”.)

New headcanon. Cheedo was so afraid of him the immortan worried there was good reason she feared him (i.e. his son had eyes for the girls), because Immortan is a paranoid, narcissist who would act like that himself; therefore, he projects what he would do on Rictus and believes he’s a threat to ‘the wives’ and that’s why Furiosa was sent guard and the chastity belts were applied. 

Because a sexual predator in Rictus I cannot see and is super problematic. Not real. Didn’t happen. Don’t know what you’re talking about. ¬.¬

Headcanon accepted. And I completely agree that this seems to fit far better with how Nathan Jones played him in the movie.

Well thanks. Now I’m having Feels about Rictus. Somebody please write something like this:

Maybe he thinks the wives are really shiny and he is excited they might give him a sibling. His interest isn’t sexual at all, and he doesn’t understand that he scares them just from his size, being unintentionally rough (maybe he tries to hug them? Pet their hair? Touch their stomachs because babies? etc) and his association with Joe.

So somebody (Miss Giddy? Furiosa?) takes him aside and explains it to him, that they would be more pleased to see him if he was calmer and didn’t grab at them etc. And he gets it and (with some reminders) behaves better and becomes a.. I don’t know, a semi-welcome visitor? I think they’d all understand that Rictus is almost as much a victim of Joe as they are.

Maybe he’s allowed to come sit in their little circle sometimes and listen to the stories the wives take turns reading to each other? 

Which Mad Max Fury Road character should you fight?

  • Furiosa: Fight her. She will beat you bloody and drive your face into the dirt but you'll be thanking her as she does it. Afterwards she would spit on your body and drive away but you will feel amazing.
  • Max: Fighting him would be like an angsty teenager lashing out at their parents, you'll break down crying midway through when you realise you have no reason to actually fight him and he'll awkwardly try to stop your gross-crying.
  • Immortan Joe: I wouldn't advise it but morally you should have a go.
  • Rictus: You will die. Try to realise 20 bears on him instead, that might do the trick.
  • Nux: You'll both be super pumped for this fight and the first part will be like pure adrenaline and you'll feel like a wild animal but then you'll break apart for a split-second and all you'll see if a very excited puppy and suddenly you'll feel terrible for fighting him even though he's still punching you.
  • Slit: Like Nux only he's not a puppy, he's an angry pit bull terrier and you'll have to go to the hospital.
  • Splendid Angharad: Even if you wanted to fight her she'll stare you down before you can get close. It'll be like her eyes are ripping your conscience out onto the ground. Go home in shame.
  • The Dag: Go and sit in the corner for even thinking about it.
  • People Eater: Do it. Fight him. He can't fight and he's on the same level of evil as Joe, there is literally no reason not to fight him.
  • Cheedo: How dare you.