mediocre-latinist:
The names for the different depth layers of the sea are funny as hell because you’ve got
“Epipelagic” that’s like “top of the sea,” nbd
“Mesopelagic” middle of the sea, also good
“Bathypelagic” deep part of the sea, all logical like that
but then you have
“Abyssopelagic” which means “holy shit, this is actually deeper than I thought,” and then
“Hadopelagic” which means “WE DON’T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK IS DOWN THERE BUT WE’RE PRETTY SURE IT’S ACTUAL LITERAL HELL”
(Source: periegesisvoid-deactivated, via cthulhu-with-a-fez)
sleeping-ranna:
Man history majors are so great because they know all this stuff but they have The One Subject and once you find out what a given history buff’s Subject is you will never be bored again because they will tell you all about it with the enthusiasm of a child on Christmas morning
This is also more widely applicable.
For example: my roommate is a linguistics major. Her One True Subject is conlangs, and she can (and has) talked for multiple hours without slowing down. She’s gonna make a language and we’re going to run around yelling at each other in it, it’ll be fun.
(via cthulhu-with-a-fez)
dancing-thru-clouds:
cups-of-tea-and-history:
violetimpudence:
prokopetz:
I love the phrase “what the entire fuck” because it implies that there exists some scenario that warrants only a “what the partial fuck”.
Well, since there are clearly scenarios which warrant giving zero fucks, it
seems plausible to infer that there exists a 0 … 1 scale of fuckitude, containing a potentially infinite number of fractional fuckery scenarios.
Fractional Fuckery Scenarios is going to be my first short story collection.
Whereas ‘what the actual fuck’ implies that there are metaphorical or theoretical fucks in play.
Dude, you missed fictional fucks, which is both excellent alliteration and hilarious.
(via cthulhu-with-a-fez)