feelsfortheshield:

iandsharman:

oprahnoodlemantra:

onesentencemusings:

alwaysbewoke:

This Christmas let’s remember this fact…

I’m not even Christian and I still feel compelled to reblog geographically ethnically accurate Jesus

#athiestsforblackjesus

“Geographically ethnically accurate Jesus”?!?

I see no geographically ethnically accurate Jesus here.

Jesus was born and raised in first century Palestine. He wasn’t from Africa or Europe. An African Jesus is no more accurate than a European Jesus.

Jesus would have likely looked something like this:

image

Interpretative paintings based upon a reconstruction by British medical artist Richard Neave, of what a 1st Century A.D. Semitic man might have looked like during Jesus Christ’s life time.

Appearing within the CNN special ‘The Mystery of Jesus’

Three portaits, 12” x 16” Oil on Paper on Panel 

© 2004 Donato Giancola 

[source]

I have to wonder why people are so uncomfortable with the idea of a Semitic Jesus,

I have to wonder why people are so uncomfortable with the idea of an ethnically Jewish Jesus.

No, actually, I don’t have to wonder, I know exactly why.

But Jesus always has beard… always

Hi!  This is because the shaving of the beard with a razor is actually forbidden by Leviticus, and it was a law that was strictly followed by teachers in Judaism at the time, although currently it’s a bit more lax in many traditions.  Since Jesus was considered to be a rabbi (a teacher), it’s assumed that he didn’t shave his beard.  At most, he would have trimmed it.

(Source: alwaysbewoke, via adelindschade)