agent-jaselin:

adventures-in-fadewalking:

extremelyunlikely:

its-myst:

cm8x-insanity:

nukewolf:

sirdragneel:

artfulaveryhofferd:

strampunch:

fairytail-angel:

verityglasses:

combthecombel:

pokemon-chick-1personalblog:

strampunch:

mobians-and-emeralds:

coffeeandcursewords:

usedtobehmc:

jamesbleach:

onceuponakhaleesi:

luckydreaming:

Are fedoras really that bad?

YES YES THEY ARE

voidethered:

ask-omnipony:

I don’t really believe this mumbo jumbo

I mean it’s a goddamn hat.

Right..?

The white rose, it symbolizes the unique beauty of all the women who wish not to be with a nice guy such as myse-

I wonder if this works with other kinds of hat…

Nothing ventured, nothing gained…

WHEEEN THE MOON HITS YOUR EYE LIKE A BIG PIZZA PIE THAT’S AMORREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Men of Tumblr are my favorite kind of people…

wait, does that mean?

oh boy…….

Luckily, this nonsense doesn’t work on girls.

Observe…

This post is immaculate

It can’t be true.

And it can’t possibly work on motorcycle helmets.

I must test it.

Nothing happening so far…

HOLY SHIT IT WORKS

What in the world?

Oh why not? This should be interesting.

Here we go!

Were all mad here in Underland!

What the hell! Never Again!

… Actually …

One more time.

Alright, I gotta try this!

Can’t be that bad!




….

…oh my god…

ask-gmodsfmrocks:

LOL

This just gets better and better

This is one of my favourite things to look at

holy shit this stuff is back

Okay Clearly something is up.

Hmm… I wonder

I’m sure nothing could possibly…

HOLY SHIT

IT GOT BETTER

I HAVE BEEN SEARCHING SO LONG FOR THIS POST OH MY GOD!!!

I wonder what happens when you wear 8 of these at once…

we’ve reached the ultimatum

IT’S BACK ON MY DASH AND IT BECAME BETTER

I see this post every couple of months and it never ceases to make me laugh like a fucking dolphin

I’m laughing because this is just the tumblr version of that Bug bunny short where the hat truck crashes and Fudd and Bugs’ personality keeps changing based on the hat they are wearing.

(via clockwork-mockingbird)

defilerwyrm:

elodieunderglass:

prokopetz:

prokopetz:

kazorus:

prokopetz:

Every time someone tries to explain the metaplot of Supernatural to me, it basically ends up sounding like redneck Dragon Ball Z. I’m sure there’s some nuance I’m failing to grasp here.

Care to elaborate on that?


…I’m not even offended, just absolutely curious.  From the stuff I’ve seen and heard about Supernatural I can’t see the connection.

Mostly, I get the impression of a show that doesn’t know how not to escalate.

Every threat’s gotta be quantitatively bigger and badder than the one that came before. Every deus ex machina’s gotta be shinier than the last one. Every season’s gotta end with a massive eleventh-hour powerup for our heroes, only for the next season to raise the stakes enough to put them back in the underdog position.

It’s like, you beat the Devil himself? Well, now you’ve gotta fight the Devil’s cousin Phil, who has conveniently gone entirely unmentioned up until now, but he’s totally twice as evil.

That last paragraph was literally supposed to be the most ridiculous hypothetical example I could think of, and people are messaging me to say “his name was Metatron, not Phil”. I can’t even make fun of this show.

I think it’s time for entertainment to stop obsessing about Saving The World because we just don’t CARE. Stop endlessly raising the stakes, entertainers!

Saving one person? I’m right there with you. 

Saving a small group of friends/family? Ohhhh my heart.

Saving a subculture/community? This is my jam. YES. YES

Saving a city? Maybe as a finale. Sell it to me and we’ll see.   

Saving a country? I’ll just about allow it.

Saving the world? LOL NO. 

Saving the Universe? Slow down Doctor Who, nobody cares.

Saving ALL OF TIME AND SPACE AND HUMANITY AND HISTORY AND PLUTO AND GRAVITY AND GOD AND ALL THE ANGELS? oh my god, are people still watching this? have the advertisers fallen asleep, or

There is a reason why charities put faces in their ads. It is because the actual number of, say, homeless LGBT youths is too big to comprehend - it just seems like too big of a problem for you to do anything about. So charities “introduce” you to the face of the problem - here is a crying teen, her name is Layla, she’s homeless, you can help her right now, she just needs 80 cents a day to change her life. If charities begged you to open your wallet and SAVE THE UNIVERSE you would glaze over and walk past. The universe? People can’t even comprehend climate change. We can barely stay on top of our social circles. We just about understand our own local politics. 

Once you get past a big number, human interest drops off - it’s sad to hear that 3,000 people died in a natural disaster, but we care more about one girl not being allowed at her prom. This is why news teams focus on the shot of the lost teddy bear, or the terrified child clutching their starving kitten - these are the small problems that make the big problems seem Real.

There is a concept called Dunbar’s number - the amount of humans that each human can care about. It’s thought to be roughly 150 people, the size of your theoretical “village.” Your friends, family, coworkers, Internet buddies, neighbors - there genuinely is a limit to how many people you can fit in your heart. It’s the average amount of friends that people have on Facebook. At around this number of people, true democracy is said to break down, because you can no longer offer all voices equal weight and must start electing spokespeople. 150 people is about the limit of our comprehension. 

Stuff that tugs the heartstrings? Saving the tiny inbred Wizarding World. Saving people who remind me of my friends and neighbors. Saving the local library. Saving the spaceship full of people. Saving the sufferers of a disease. Saving this particular dog. Saving a marginalized community - honestly, this is the plot of almost every Discworld novel, and there are over 40 of those and we never got sick of them.

But yeah, don’t try to get my attention by putting The World at stake. I’m not even sure I like most of it.

As Stalin said, "The death of one man is a tragedy. The death of millions is a statistic.“

I am…a little in lust with this post.  Everything is so accurate and so exactly what I’ve said in my eternal complaints about SPN that I am a little in love with all of you.

(via cthulhu-with-a-fez)

theghostoffawkes:

spaceisprettycool:

ardatli:

hagar-972:

westsemiteblues:

adrivenleaf:

westsemiteblues:

the-independent-jew:

One thing I love about Judaism is that long involved conversations about things like “can a zombie attend shul?” or “can i use my pet dragon to light candles on shabbat?” or “is meat from a replicator kosher?” are seen as completely normal.

Yes, but it should avoid contact with a Cohen if it can, and if the dragon is a Gentile sure, why not, a pet dragon is an ideal Shabbos goy, since it probably lives with you, and will get a kick out of helping. If it’s a Jewish dragon, though, no, it’s better for you to do it yourself rather than cause another Jew to violate Shabbat.

Wait wait… if a jew owned the dragon as a pet wouldn’t using the beast’s labor to light candles be pretty explicitly prohibited?

Good point. Is the dragon property, or is it a roommate?

I think it was ruled that one may allow a dragon to ignite a fire if (a) the dragon is non-sapient, and preventing them from lighting the fire would be animal cruelty, or (b) the dragon is sapient, non-Jewish and not in indentured service.

And one cannot bring a dragon into a household for the express purpose of lighting candles at a later date, since the Jew would be directly benefiting from the dragon’s actions on Shabbat. 

But if the dragon just happens to live there already and feels the urge to light candles, it should not be stopped from doing so – as the sages said: “the same candle that benefits one can be used to benefit one hundred.“ (Shulchan Aruch HaRav, 276:6) 

This was a thrill from start to finish.

This is outstanding

(Source: chai-on-life, via bonehandledknife)